- Lewis, who is partial to the ‘Zag’ approach and has never been shy to weigh in (even when he’s taking me to task for my Marcus Aurelius quote),
- Valeria, who is partial to Caravaggio and whose insight into the actual picture I used could have been an alternate title to my post,
- Ann, another fan of KGiants #5, and who has been an invaluable pal in pushing me out to the community at The Fix,
- Cam, whose “Speed Kills” outlook must be at odds with his new diapering duties,
- Mario, another 5-er fan, who brought in two good vignettes from Italian marketing to animate the point (is this a community, or what?),
- CK, who has so consistently kicked me into gear for so many months I feel guilty when I don’t post, and who is teasing us with a ‘Zag’ book for our next Book Club outing,
- David, who brought the idea of personal accountability to the ‘Zag’ fan club, with good reason,
- Gianandrea, whose double case study of Pepsi in Italy showed that even giants can kill giants,
- John, who gave me a much appreciated boost with his post on starting his own new venture,
- Jeremy, who animated a point that shows up below, namely extreme focus on where the giant fails,
- John at Bayer, who offers up how you can outflank the giant and take him over your thin ice,
- Carol, who nails the “99% of winning is just showing up” Woody Allen strategy (see below? I listened),
- Tenacious Maria, another huge proponent of #9, below (with thanks),
- Shashank, who brought in aikido, and a bit of #9, neatly bundled up in an excellent comment and case study from India,
- Steve, a speed killer from St. Andrews (almost went there in college for a junior year — would have been studying Shakespeare and not Japanese industrial strategy… not sure I did the right thing sometimes…) who delivered us a great case study of thin ice and speed,
- and Roger, whose writing is inspiring and whose questions make me think. Which hurts sometimes.
Compare your premium product to their standard product. Yes, I know, they have a premium product and you have a standard one. I know. I get it. We’re talking about fighting unfairly. Not picking a fight with someone your own size. At Sony, we went out of our way to compare our under-represented type II audio cassette with TDK’s very successful type I tape. Unfair. We compared Hi8 Metal Particletape with standard MP tape for camcorders. Sure, these are different products. But ours was better. And that’s the point. Pick the fight you want. No one said you had to follow the rules.
Lesson #9: All the wood behind the arrow
Alexander. Napoleon. Blitzkrieg. This is the story of relative strength, not absolute strength. You only need to be stronger than your enemy is where you happen to be fighting.
If this is left-handed Jews named Clem, then that’s what you know. But you know them inside out. You’ve forgotten more about this customer base than your giant competitor will ever know. So flaunt your knowledge. Share your deep understanding. For free. Tell the world (some) of what you know to the extent that the depth of your sharing makes it obvious that you’re so far the expert that facts told them by others will be discounted because they’re not getting them from you.
These are ten, solid ways to take the giant in your industry out at the knees. Or, if you prefer the classical reference, right between the eyes.
You can’t necessarily outmuscle them (unless you pick on the scrawny one in the back — lesson #8).
You can’t outspend them (unless you outspend them in a localized way — lesson #9).
And you can’t necessarily be everywhere they are (but you can know more than they ever will — lesson #10).
But there’s nothing that says you can’t beat them. Nothing.*
Regards.
Copyright (c) 2007 Stephen Denny
PS: * Of course, there are a few ways a giant can kill a flea. Stay tuned?
We talked about fighting unfairly with Gestalt CEO Bill Loftus a couple of weeks ago. If you are a David, your competitive advantage may be the ability to work on faster feedback loops and improve a delivery of product or service by testing frequently.
Sometimes the advantage lies in not even being on the radar of larger competitors until it’s too late.
Or you do a preemptive strike by getting very close to your customer on a regular basis – taking the time, as you suggest, developing a relationship vs. making the work a transaction. I wrote about it in my weekly FC Expert column linked from “Our Product is a Relationship” post.
Stephen,
I enjoyed reading Killing Giants, Part 3 as much as the first two parts. Perhaps you can combine all three posts into a single pdf file that would be accessible to your readers? The benefits of doing this would be twofold. First, it would allow us (your readers) to easily read the entire “Killing Giants” trilogy as one single document, and second, I think it would be a better way for you to save and store this excellent series of posts for any future use on your part.
Keep up the good work.
Pat
Stephen – Thank you for the ongoing series.
I’m wondering if you could expound on #8 a bit more. It seems to me it holds the greatest risk of becoming an area of ethical concern. I think it would be fine if one still holds a greater value than the other (say, if my premium and the competition’s standard are comparably priced, or if mine is still priced lower), but if it turns out that their premium is just as good as mine (or better), and priced just as low as mine (or lower), then I will have lost the trust of the consumer, and I will have deserved to lose it.
What are your thoughts?
Valeria — these are all great points. Speed is usually the one that works best when fighting giants — bureaucracy will kill most things, though, don’t you think?
Patrick — thank you for your kind words — yes, I think a PDF might be a good bit of ‘merchandising’ coming out of this rather unexpected ‘trilogy’. I’ll look into it and see if The Fix wants to host it!
The Killing Giants trilogy has been a wonderful source of inspiration. I have printed out the entire series and have it tacked to my strategy wall, next to my white board. Keep it coming!
So I’ve kicked you into guilt,er, uh, gear, eh? As Maria’s comment supports this series is making for a good book (at least a good PDF book). If you weren’t an all famous DF blogger it could eventually be a book covered by a certain club. Hmmm.
Guess I’ll just continue to be a loyal reader and kicker (I’m just trying to inspire but hey, a kick can inspire I guess :-).
Cam: re #8 (“Fighting Unfairly”), you can easily steer clear of ethical concerns by being terribly honest about the data and message you convey —
“… look, the picture quality is 40% better with our Hi8 Metal Particle tape compared to that standard stuff… you should really step up and try it.”
You don’t have to tell them that there are others who can provide it — you’re in business to sell your own stuff, after all.
Now, to be clear, this argument applied to people using standard 8mm tape with Hi8 camcorders back in the day, but the example still holds I think, doesn’t it?
No need to lie — you’re just giving the consumer a clear understanding that there is something better and they should try it. Nothing unethical about it. Unfair, sure, but not unethical.