Note to CMO: The Evil of Satisficing

by Stephen Denny on August 10, 2009

gargoyleDear CMO:

I have met the greatest of all evils and its name is Satisficing. OK, it’s not a name, per se, but a mashup of two words – satisfy and suffice. Squint and you could probably find the real meaning in there, too – sacrifice. Satisficing is the greatest of all evils. Here’s why.

Your message isn’t heard because your listener quickly pigeon-holed you after your first two sentences. How did this happen to your carefully crafted elevator speech? Simple. You used a cliché, an expression, a buzzword or another easy tag that allowed them to say, “Got it, I know exactly what bucket to put you in. There. You’re categorized. I don’t have to listen anymore.”

Your creative isn’t working because your marketing chief gave the responsibility of positioning the product to the creatives at the agency, and they don’t do positioning – they do creative. Why did this happen to the product you spent the better part of 18 months delivering? Easy. The marketing guy did the easy thing – he gave the assignment of “advertising” it to the “advertising” agency. He didn’t do the rigorous positioning work, the metaphor elicitation with customers, the ethnological and anthropological observational in situ research. “We know our customers. We don’t need to do that.” And so your positioning work is now in the hands of a designer.

Your innovative idea is tamped down because the grizzled veterans of the company won’t let it happen. Why? “We tried that once and it didn’t work.” They tried what they think they heard you say, but they didn’t try what you’re thinking, in the way you were planning on implementing it, with the level of expertise you would be able to deliver it with. They stopped listening when they thought they heard what they heard. They didn’t get it. And you now have an uphill struggle because the rest of the organization satisfices by remembering what your grizzlies had to say about your so-called new idea.

Satisficing means we don’t have to think anymore. We’re busy. We’ve seen it all, heard it all, done it all, and don’t need any more because we’re intellectually lazy.

How do we avoid this pitfall? Create new mental models – and most importantly, create new descriptions for our ideas. Avoid clichés like the plague. When we hear “mission critical” or “enterprise class” or anything that warrants having quotes around it, throw it out and think of another way to say it. Anything that sounds like copy is something we should throw out and re-work. Awkward beats slick if we’re aiming for stickiness.

Remember that we’re aiming for being memorable. Because we’ll categorize you if we can. That’s how we’re wired.

Regards.

Email This Post Email This Post

{ 4 trackbacks }

Are You Satisficing? | Business Pundit
August 15, 2009 at 11:51 am
Are You Satisficing? | Technology you can trust here...
August 17, 2009 at 1:20 am
Twitter Trackbacks for Note to CMO: The Evil of Satisficing | Note to CMO [notetocmo.com] on Topsy.com
August 31, 2009 at 9:51 am
feed your curiosity « eskimon
September 20, 2009 at 5:58 pm

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Elaine Spitz August 10, 2009 at 11:16 am

Wow! This is really an eye-opener! Sorry, that’s certainly one of the forbidden cliches. I consider this some of the best marketing advice I’ve heard in a while. Thanks.

2 Stephen Denny August 10, 2009 at 11:28 am

Elaine: glad this resonated with you and thanks for commenting – I also put a piece up on The Daily Fix with a slightly different take on the “satisficing” issue, here:

http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2009/08/satisficing_and_the_death_of_g.html

Thanks -

S. Denny

3 Susan Fantle August 11, 2009 at 12:44 pm

Stephen,
I agree with you about clichés and having opening lines in marketing messages full of buzzwords. But if some words that appear to be clichés are still actively used within an industry, using them helps your message resonate with your target audience and positions your company as part of the club. The key is to know the industry/field to which you are marketing and whether those words are still part of the daily lexicon.

4 Stephen Denny August 11, 2009 at 12:52 pm

Susan: thanks for your note – can’t disagree with what you’ve said here. There’s a world of difference between using vocabulary that positions you as an insider and leaning on cliches; the former positions you as familiar, inside and expert, while the other gets you lost in a hurry.

We often fall into traps that allow our listener to quickly pigeon-hole us, often incorrectly. It’s our job to ensure we touch the correct nerves so that we elicit an honest, guile-less response from our listeners. (Notice that I could have said, “hit the right notes…”)…

5 Lela August 12, 2009 at 6:03 am

Hmm…. this is actually pretty sound advice for my novel synopsis, which positions the book for a literary agent. Thanks!

6 Stephen Denny August 12, 2009 at 8:28 am

Lela: if EVER there was a time and a place to avoid cliches, pigeon-holes and “I’ve seen this movie a thousand times,” it’s in your pitch to a literary agent. Glad this hit a timely and resonant chord with you.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: